Evaluation of Fairness of Trademarks Royalty Prices in Transfer Pricing Transactions (Case Study of PT X Court Decisions)
Evaluasi Kewajaran Harga Royalti Trademarks Dalam Transaksi Transfer Pricing (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan PT X)
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze the arm’s length price of transfer pricing transactions for parties conducting cross-border transactions as well as to see the basis and considerations of the panel of judges regarding royalty on trademark license for tax court decision disputes. The method used in this research is a qualitative approach by looking at the sources of books, documents, national and international journals, as well as laws related to the research topic of transfer pricing. The results of this study concluded that the beneficial owner of IP was Friesland Brands BV, therefore the economic ownership of the IP was Friesland Brands BV because it had developed and continued to develop royalties on the trademark of data, methods, processes, capabilities, and expertise in connection with the milk-making activity. The Panel of Judges did not use the various meanings of a trademark to prove the existence of the trademark. The definition of a trademark that can be used by judges to prove the existence of a trademark is based on international and domestic provisions.
Keywords: arm’s length price, tax dispute, trademarks
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis harga wajar atas transaksi transfer pricing bagi pihak-pihak yang melakukan transaksi lintas negara serta melihat dasar dan pertimbangan majelis hakim terkait royalty on trademark lisence atas sengketa putusan pengadilan pajak. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan melihat berbagai sumber antara lain yaitu buku-buku, dokumen, jurnal nasional dan internasional, serta undang-undang yang terkait dengan topik transfer pricing. Hasil penelitian ini memperoleh kesimpulan bahwa beneficial owner atas IP adalah Friesland Brands BV, oleh karena itu economic ownership atas IP tersebut adalah Friesland Brands BV karena telah mengembangkan dan melanjutkan untuk mengembangkan royalty on trademark tersebut atas data, metode, proses, kemampuan dan keahlian sehubungan dengan aktivitas pembuatan susu tersebut. Majelis Hakim tidak menggunakan berbagai pengertian merek dagang untuk melakukan pembuktian keberadaan merek dagang tersebut. Pengertian merek dagang yang dapat digunakan hakim untuk membuktikan keberadaan trademark (merek dagang) tersebut berdasarkan ketentuan internasional dan domestik.
Kata Kunci: harga wajar, sengketa pajak, trademarks
Downloads
References
Chen, X. (2009). Behavioral Game Split: A New Perspective on the Arm ’ s-Length Principle. Tax Management Transfer Pricing Report, 17(19), 751–754.
Darussalam, Septriadi, D., & Kristiaji, B. B. (2013). Transfer Pricing, Ide, Strategi, dan Panduan Praktis Dalam Perspektif Pajak Internasional. Jakarta: Danny Darussalam Tax Center.
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (1993). Surat Edaran Direktorat Jenderal Pajak SE-04/PJ.7/1993 tanggal 9 Maret 1993 yang Mengatur tentang Petunjuk Penanganan Kasus-Kasus Transfer Pricing (Seri TP-1)
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2010). Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-43/PJ/2010 tentang Penerapan Prinsip Kewajaran dan Kelaziman Usaha dalam Transaksi Antara Wajib Pajak dengan Pihak Yang Mempunyai Hubungan Istimewa.
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2011). Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-32/PJ/2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-43/PJ/2010 tentang Penerpaan Prinsip Kewajaran dan Kelaziman Usaha dalam Transaksi Antara Wajib Pajak dengan Pihak Yang Mempunyai Hubungan Istimewa.
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2013). Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor SE-50/PJ/2013 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Pemeriksaan Terhadap Wajib Pajak Yang Mempunyai Hubungan Istimewa.
Gorp, M.V. (2011). The Definition, Ownership and Transfer Issues Around Intangible Property Under The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. Belanda: University of Tilburg.
Irina, Timoshenko. (2014). Definition and Valuation of Intangible Assets for Internastional Transfer Pricing Purposes. Swedia: Lund University.
Markham, M. (2005). The Transfer Pricing of Intangible. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
OECD. (2010). OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013). Revised Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing Aspect of Intangibles. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Przysuski, B. M., Lalapet, S., & Swaneveld, H. (2004). Transfer Pricing of Intangible Property — Part I : A Canadian-US Comparison. 10–19.
Surahmat, R. (2005). Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Tobing, C.G. (2013). Penemuan Hukum Dalam Sengketa Perpajakan. Inside Tax, Edisi 16, Juli-Agustus 2013.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2013). United Nations: Practical Manual on Transfer Pricing for Developing Countries. New York: United Nations.
Wilkie, J. S. (2012). Reflecting on the “Arm’s Length Principle”: What is the “Principle”? Where Next?. Dalam Fundamental of International Transfer Pricing in Law and Economics, ed W. Schon & K.A.Konrad. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Wright, D. R. (1994). Intangibles and Transfer Pricing. International Transfer Pricing Journal, Volume 1, No.2. Published by International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, Amsterdam.
Copyright (c) 2021 JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright for all articles published in JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial is retained by the authors. Upon submission, authors grant the journal the right of first publication. The copyright holder, identified as the authors, is clearly stated on the full text of all published articles (both HTML and PDF formats). Authors are free to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article (e.g., posting to institutional repositories or publishing in books), provided that the initial publication in JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial is acknowledged.
JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial, publishes all content under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. This license permits others to share, remix, adapt, and build upon the work for commercial purposes, provided the original work is properly attributed to the authors and the journal.
The full text of published articles includes clear information about the licensing terms, ensuring that users are aware of how the content can be used. The terms of the Creative Commons license are available on the journal’s website, and a direct link to the relevant Creative Commons license is provided for each article.
Authors are encouraged to post their work in institutional repositories or on personal websites prior to and during the submission process, as it may lead to increased visibility and citation. Authors should provide appropriate credit when distributing their work in these alternate formats.
.svg_1.png){kind=logo}
