Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or institutions.

 

Copyright Notice

Author(s) who wish to publish with this journal should agree to the following terms:

  1. Author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal for noncommercial purposes.
  2. Author(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

The publisher publish and distribute the Article with the copyright notice to the Jurnal Suara Hukum with the article license CC-BY-NC 4.0.

 

Focus and ScopeFocus and Scope of:

sociology, law, politics, education, social development, government, democracy, religion and politics, urban studies, rural studies, gender, media studies, and other related themes.

 

Peer Review Process

The manuscripts submitted online to the JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial will be peer-reviewed. The practice of peer review aims to ensure the quality of articles published in this journal. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. The reviewers in our journal play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of the journal.

All manuscripts submitted to JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosialare peer-reviewed using the procedure outlined below.  

Initial manuscript evaluation
The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those manuscripts that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least two experts for review.

Type of peer review
JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial employs a double-blind review where the authors of the manuscript will remain anonymous throughout the process. The manuscript is reviewed by the reviewers that are assigned based on their expertise.

 Reviewer reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: - Is original - Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has results that are clearly presented and support the conclusions - Correctly references previous relevant work. Language correction is not part of the peer-review process, but referees may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript.

 Editor’s decision
The final decision of the manuscript (accepted, accepted with minor revision, accepted with major revision, rejected, or re-submit) is made by the Editor in Chief (together with Editorial Board is required for consideration) based on the reviewers’ critical comments. The editor’s decision is final.  

 Final report
A final report of the decision on whether to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers that may include verbatim comments from the reviewers.   

 

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.